تكنولوجيا

قصة غير عادية لنظام طاقة طورته حفنة من النشطاء واستخدمه 36 مليون شخص

خيارات الطاقة الكهربائية

في منتصف التسعينيات ، كان لدى عدد قليل من نشطاء الطاقة في ماساتشوستس رؤية: ماذا لو كان لدى المستهلكين خيار في الطاقة التي يستخدمونها؟ بدلاً من أن يتم تغذيتها بالقوة من قبل مصادر الكهرباء التي تختارها شركة المرافق ، ماذا لو كانت المدن والبلدات ومجموعات الأفراد تستطيع شراء كهرباء أنظف وأرخص؟

يستخدم ستة وثلاثون مليون شخص في الولايات المتحدة نظام طاقة طورته حفنة من النشطاء في التسعينيات.[{” attribute=””>MIT scholar examines this unusual story.

In the mid-1990s, a few energy activists in Massachusetts had a vision: What if citizens had choice about the energy they consumed? Instead of being force-fed electricity sources selected by a utility company, what if cities, towns, and groups of individuals could purchase power that was cleaner and cheaper?

The small group of activists — including a journalist, the head of a small nonprofit, a local county official, and a legislative aide — drafted model legislation along these lines that reached the state Senate in 1995. The measure stalled out. In 1997, they tried again. Massachusetts legislators were busy passing a bill to reform the state power industry in other ways, and this time the activists got their low-profile policy idea included in it — as a provision so marginal it only got a brief mention in The Boston Globe’s coverage of the bill.

Today, this idea, often known as Community Choice Aggregation (CCA), is used by roughly 36 million people in the U.S., or 11 percent of the population. Local residents, as a bloc, purchase energy with certain specifications attached, and over 1,800 communities have adopted CCA in six states, with others testing CCA pilot programs. From such modest beginnings, CCA has become a big deal.

“It started small, then had a profound impact,” says David Hsu, an associate professor at MIT who studies energy policy issues. Indeed, the trajectory of CCA is so striking that Hsu has researched its origins, combing through a variety of archival sources and interviewing the principals. He has now written a journal article examining the lessons and implications of this episode.

Hsu’s paper, “Straight out of Cape Cod: The origin of community choice aggregation and its spread to other states,” appears in advance online form in the journal Energy Research and Social Science, and in the April print edition of the publication.

“I wanted to show people that a small idea could take off into something big,” Hsu says. “For me that’s a really hopeful democratic story, where people could do something without feeling they had to take on a whole giant system that wouldn’t immediately respond to only one person.”

Local control

Aggregating consumers to purchase energy was not a novelty in the 1990s. Companies within many industries have long joined forces to gain purchasing power for energy. And Rhode Island tried a form of CCA slightly earlier than Massachusetts did.

However, it is the Massachusetts model that has been adopted widely: Cities or towns can require power purchases from, say, renewable sources, while individual citizens can opt out of those agreements. More state funding (for things like efficiency improvements) is redirected to cities and towns as well.

In both ways, CCA policies provide more local control over energy delivery. They have been adopted in California, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, and Ohio. Meanwhile, Maryland, New Hampshire, and Virginia have recently passed similar legislation (also known as municipal or government aggregation, or community choice energy).

For cities and towns, Hsu says, “Maybe you don’t own outright the whole energy system, but let’s take away one particular function of the utility, which is procurement.”

That vision motivated a handful of Massachusetts activists and policy experts in the 1990s, including journalist Scott Ridley, who co-wrote a 1986 book, “Power Struggle,” with the University of Massachusetts historian Richard Rudolph and had spent years thinking about ways to reconfigure the energy system; Matt Patrick, chair of a local nonprofit focused on energy efficiency; Rob O’Leary, a local official in Barnstable County, on Cape Cod; and Paul Fenn, a staff aide to the state senator who chaired the legislature’s energy committee.

“It started with these political activists,” Hsu says.

Hsu’s research emphasizes several lessons to be learned from the fact the legislation first failed in 1995, before unexpectedly passing in 1997. Ridley remained an author and public figure; Patrick and O’Leary would each eventually be elected to the state legislature, but only after 2000; and Fenn had left his staff position by 1995 and worked with the group long-distance from California (where he became a long-term advocate about the issue). Thus, at the time CCA passed in 1997, none of its main advocates held an insider position in state politics. How did it succeed?

Lessons of the legislation

In the first place, Hsu believes, a legislative process resembles what the political theorist John Kingdon has called a “multiple streams framework,” in which “many elements of the policymaking process are separate, meandering, and uncertain.” Legislation isn’t entirely controlled by big donors or other interest groups, and “policy entrepreneurs” can find success in unpredictable windows of opportunity.

“It’s the most true-to-life theory,” says Hsu.

Second, Hsu emphasizes, finding allies is crucial. In the case of CCA, that came about in a few ways. Many towns in Massachusetts have a town-level legislature known as Town Meeting; the activists got those bodies in about 20 towns to pass nonbinding resolutions in favor of community choice. O’Leary helped create a regional county commission in Barnstable County, while Patrick crafted an energy plan for it. High electricity rates were affecting all of Cape Cod at the time, so community choice also served as an economic benefit for Cape Cod’s working-class service-industry employees. The activists also found that adding an opt-out clause to the 1997 version appealed to legislators, who would support CCA if their constituents were not all bound to it.

“You really have to stick with it, and you have to look for coalition partners,” Hsu says. “It’s fun to hear them [the activists] يتحدثون عن الذهاب إلى قاعات المدينة وكيف حاولوا الحصول على الدعم الشعبي. إذا كنت تبحث عن حلفاء ، يمكنك إنجاز الأمور. [I hope] يمكن للناس رؤيتها [themselves] في نشاط الآخرين حتى لو لم يكونوا هم مثلك تمامًا.

بحلول عام 1997 ، حظي تشريع CCA بدعم جغرافي أكبر ، وكان يُنظر إليه على أنه منفعة اقتصادية وبيئية للناخبين ، ولن يتطلب من أي شخص أن يصبح عضوًا. وجد النشطاء ، أثناء إجراء المقابلات الإعلامية وتنظيم المؤتمرات ، قوة دفع إضافية في مبدأ اختيار المواطن.

“من المثير للاهتمام بالنسبة لي أن أرى كيف أن الخطاب [citizen] يقول هسو: “الاختيار وخطاب الديمقراطية فعالان”. يشعر المشرعون أنه يتعين عليهم منح الجميع خيارًا. ويعبر عن رغبة جماعية لاختيار تفوز به الخدمات العامة بكونها احتكارات.

ويضيف: “نحن بحاجة إلى إرساء المبادئ التي تشكل الأنظمة ، بدلاً من مجرد اعتبار النظام كما هو معطى ومحاولة تبرير مبادئ عمرها 150 عامًا.

كان العنصر الأخير في الانتقال إلى CCA هو التوقيت المناسب. كان حاكم ولاية ماساتشوستس والمجلس التشريعي يبحثان بالفعل عن “صفقة كبيرة” لإعادة هيكلة إمدادات الكهرباء وتخفيف قبضة المرافق ؛ كان CCA جزءًا من حركة الإصلاح الأوسع نطاقًا. ومع ذلك ، كان اعتماد التقييم القطري المشترك تدريجيًا ؛ حوالي ثلث مدن ماساتشوستس مع CCA تبنتها فقط في السنوات الخمس الماضية.

لا يعني نمو CCA أنها غير معرضة للإلغاء أو جهود المعارضة الممولة من المرافق – “في كاليفورنيا ، كان هناك تراجع شديد ،” يلاحظ هسو. ومع ذلك ، يخلص هسو إلى أن حقيقة أن حفنة من النشطاء يمكنهم إطلاق حركة سياسة الطاقة الوطنية هي تذكير مفيد بأن تصرفات الجميع يمكن أن تحدث فرقًا.

يقول هسو: “لم يكن الأمر كما لو كانوا قد مروا بحاجز ، لقد وجدوا طريقة للالتفاف حوله”. “أريد أن يعرف طلابي أنه يمكنهم تنظيم المستقبل وإعادة تصميمه. وهذا يتطلب التزامًا معينًا وعملًا طويل الأمد.

المرجع: “مباشرة من كيب كود: أصل تجميع اختيار المجتمع وانتشاره إلى ولايات أخرى” بقلم ديفيد هسو ، 1 كانون الأول (ديسمبر) 2021 ، بحوث الطاقة والعلوم الاجتماعية.
DOI: 10.1016 / j.erss.2021.102393


Source link

مقالات ذات صلة

أضف تعليقاً

لن يتم نشر عنوان بريدك الإلكتروني.

Back to top button